Arild Danielsen on Styleboost
Add your own 15 comments RSS feed icon

concidering he's only 17 years old, it's quite impressive.

 #1 Unknown User on May 26, 2003

wow, those photos are beautful, the page is very nice to. But it seems the audio-control does not work, that's a shame 'cause the sound, as you said, are pretty irritating

 #2 Unknown User on May 26, 2003

Antoher non-interesting photography site. Some photos are actually really bad, but there are a few that's great also. 17 years you say. Maybe we have telent under development here, maybe he's just been lucky with a few shots... We'll see I guess. Keep it up! I say...

 #3 Unknown User on May 26, 2003

I think the previous button should be close to the next button

 #4 Unknown User on May 30, 2003

I agree. Keep it up.

 #5 Unknown User on June 2, 2003

Actually he's 19 (says born in 1985), still young though. Even considering the age I have to say I'm not very impressed by the photos, sure a few look quite good, but overall it's not very fancy.

 #6 Unknown User on September 27, 2004

He does have some nice photos, but then again he has some that just looks like amature photos taken for fun. but as said, he's only 17 so this can be the beginning of something good! not suprised if he shows up later much much stronger. and about the music.. sounds like somebody's trying to learn playing piano.. and dont succed..

 #7 Unknown User on September 27, 2004

I like the music, it gives the viewing of the portfolio a cinemative/movie feel, tone it down a bit tho. However the loading screens really detracts from the experience. TOO BIG without any real importance, maybe do some loading in the background while I"m viewing a certain photograph. It's annoying to get smacked in the head with such big type "loading" screens everytime I switch to a photo.

 #8 Unknown User on September 27, 2004

Theres previous and next buttons? Where? I tend to mouseover photos as I'm watching them on the screen and that "Close"-sign ís really unsmooth and irritating. Also it seems to load everything from scratch regardless of how many times you've seen a photo. And the soundtrack in't seamless. OK, it looks pretty but what doesn't these days? For a photographers portfolio site they have to do better. Oh, and he's 19.

 #9 Unknown User on September 27, 2004

The site is not that special, but I LOVE the music, that is what makes this site stand out from the crowd

 #10 Unknown User on September 27, 2004

excellent design & website, nice & simple flash but bad photos.

 #11 Unknown User on September 27, 2004

not bad, but sorry, not really good. i dont like the way the navigation goes over the stage - it somehow cuts into the stage. the music is nice, but it should loop neatly. and the preloader is a pain. ... only talking about the flash presentation.

 #12 Unknown User on September 30, 2004

Quality of images is way to low - The site overall feel is cheap! Sorry

 #13 Unknown User on October 4, 2004

I think there's some confusion here. Are wed talking about the old or the new portfolio? The new site is simple and clean, attention for detail and makes the contents stand out. A bit in the same way Elixirstudio does

 #14 Axel Vansteenkiste on September 2, 2005

don`t know what yall talkin about, its professional, simple, clean,,,,simply good design and outstanding photography!

 #15 Aleksander Hahn on October 4, 2005

Log in to write a comment

Remember me
New to Styleboost? Sign up!
Members may write comments, save favorites, and more.
Have you forgotten your password?